No child left inside

Filed under: Education, Sense of place, Youth — Ernie Atencio at 8:56 am on Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Ernie Atencio

Ernie Atencio

This morning I ran into a friend who works for Rocky Mountain Youth Corps, a local AmeriCorps and Youth Conservation Corps program that employs young people in all variety of community service and conservation projects around northern New Mexico. He is always so pumped about his work, new educational initiatives, inspiring success stories. I’ve worked with youth in the past – was once an Outward Bound “hood in the woods” myself – so I know it can be both brutally challenging and deeply gratifying. I understand why he’s always excited.

Today he was talking about the New Mexico No Child Left Inside Coalition. This is not new, but got me thinking and plowing back through some old material.

Richard Louv’s 2005 book, Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature Deficit Disorder, certainly got a lot of people’s attention. That it is healthy for kids to have unstructured play outside is not a new idea, but Louv’s book drew clear connections between a deficit of nature in children’s lives and a costly epidemic of learning disabilities, behavioral disorders and childhood obesity. And the final link is the kind of adults those kids with nature deficit disorder turn into. No wonder we’re in such and environmental mess.

Louv spoke at a Quivira Coalition conference in Albuquerque two years ago and had hard-bitten ranchers teary-eyed as they recounted their own wild country upbringing. It rings true.

Since then dozens of New Mexico youth, educational and conservation organizations have coalesced together to get children unplugged and outside to learn in and from nature. I know people imagine all us Westerners always out on the land, running cattle, hiking the peaks, hunting and fishing and running rivers. But as one example of the disconnect, the New Mexico State Parks Division estimates that although 80 percent of our rural state’s school kids live within a half-hour of a state park, less than 10 percent have ever visited one. The coalition proposes to pay for this outdoor education program with a 1% tax on the sale of TVs and video games (undoubtedly the prime culprits), which would raise an estimated $4 million dollars a year. That could provide a lot of precious and transformational experiences for a lot of children.

I’ve got nothing against tests and educational performance standards, but our local school district seems to be in such a perpetual panic to meet No Child Left Behind standards that my son probably spends more of his school day preparing for and taking tests than he spends outside. We’ll all be happier when it’s the other way around.

3 Comments »

Comment by Ted

May 13, 2008 @ 3:32 pm

So, as we all get more and more concerned about gas prices all I can say is “take a hike”. The new depression is going to require all of us to live smarter, walk, share rides and bike more if we want to pass on viable legacy to our kids and their kids. Let’s invest our public will and dollars in a new New Deal that promotes green energy, conservation ethics,sustainable community infrastructure, and asset-based positive youth and community development. Our bottom line needs to be investing in healthy relationships with ourselves, each other, and the planet.

Comment by WinterWarlock

May 16, 2008 @ 6:12 am

This is one of the best ideas I’ve seen in a long time…we tax cigarettes because of the health implications, it only makes sense to tax the video games, etc…let’s get those kids outside!!

Comment by Mark Wright

May 16, 2008 @ 9:03 pm

1st of all rural, there are very few Children in rural NM.

Most rural people tend to keep their computer and game tech stuff to none or a minimum and turned OFF…no time for it, same for their kids.

And New Mexico State Parks quoting that of those few, 80% have never visited a State Park? I DOUBT that supposed statistic. MOST of those kids live very close to those parks and I would venture to say 99.99% have been to the parks in their respective areas.

Now NM kids in Santa Fe, Albq and larger metro areas, NM State Parks might have a good point for those.

Hardly ever see a fat rural kid….most the city kids though carry alot of extra grease, that can only come from not being outside enough.

WHY another tax? NM has plenty of extra dough now ( Oil and gas royalities are thru the ROOF ).

Paying for this edu program seems not so much a problem….but how does one get em to use it?

Perhaps a better idea is PAY the kids who go to a park and use it.

A TV and game boy tax is just another deal where the parents pay the 1% and the sameo sameo goes on and on.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Comment spam protected by SpamBam