Let’s see more western history lessons!

Filed under: Corporate Power, Forest management, Logging, Sense of place, Western Culture, Writers — Felice Pace at 10:38 am on Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Felice Pace

Felice Pace

Ed Quillen’s Writers on the Range essay in the March 3rd HCN - “We’re in the land of Lincoln” - is not only erudite and well written, it is also a public service.

Americans are notoriously ahistorical in outlook. Westerners are often even worse - many of us believe outrageous myths about our past which function to hide not only past injustices but also current inequities and the likely consequences of current decisions. So anyone who provides a truly historical perspective is worthy of praise. LET’S SEE MORE ESSAYS WHICH PROVIDE WESTERN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES!

There is one problem with Quillen’s essay, however. He fails to sufficiently identify one of Lincoln’s most questionable western legacies - the railroad grants. During the 1860s Lincoln and the Republicans provided the big railroad corporations with generous land grants. The seminal law was the Pacific Railway Act signed into law by Lincoln on July 1, 1862.

Quillen may have omitted specifics about the railroad grants because his premise is that Lincoln was motivated by a desire to “give the little guy a chance if he got there early and was willing to work hard.” The railroad grants, however, went to the nation’s largest and most powerful corporations. They led directly to the domination of western landscapes by large timber corporations which have never ceased their drive to clearcut the 200,000,000 acres of land provided by the federal government via the railroad land grants.

The myth that the West was primarily developed by rugged individuals and families is one of the West’s most persistent. It has survived and thrived even though the New Western Historians, led by Patricia Limerick, Donald Worster and Richard White, have intellectually demolished it. While individuals and families definitely played a role in the West’s development, so did venture capitalists and large corporations financed by eastern and foreign bankers. We ignore that part of our western history to our peril.
_________________

Those who wish to get an historical perspective on the development of the American West can start with Patricia Limerick’s Legacy of Conquest: The Unbroken Past of the American West.

For a view of the western railroad land grants see Railroads and Clearcuts: Legacy of Congress’s 1864 Northern Pacific Railroad Land Grant by Derrick Jensen, George Draffan, John Osborn and the Inland Empire Public Lands Council.

3 Comments »

Comment by Ed Quillen

March 25, 2008 @ 5:14 pm

I certainly agree with Felice Pace that there’s plenty of mythology in the popular history of the American West. I have sometimes argued that “The Conquest of the West” is the American Iliad, our defining epic of nationhood. Just as the ancient Greeks delighted in the tales of Achilles and Hector, and the ancient Hebrews celebrated David and Goliath, we have the homesteaders and the miners and all the rest. Such accounts may lack some literal truth, but they often offer a great deal of cultural insight.

I wanted to illustrate a common “idealistic” theme behind three important laws: the Homestead Act, the General Mining Law of 1872, and the Colorado Doctrine of Prior Appropriation.

Of course all three were quickly put to use by big business. Large ranches had employees file homestead claims at water spots, since he who controlled access to water also controlled the surrounding pasturage, and once the homesteader had “proved up,” he sold the land to the company. After miners got past simple placer deposits and the soft rotten quartz in shallow lode mines, mining and milling took expensive machinery that required outside capital which meant big business. And once the easy ditches had been dug, water development required co-operation and capital, sometimes private, sometimes public.

In other words, the “family-farm” (or its mining equivalent) might have remained as an ideal (recall that until the 1980s, there was in theory a 160-acre limit on farms getting Reclamation water), but in reality, that ideal was quickly superseded (those California corporate farms irrigating thousands of acres with Reclamation water).

As for the railroad land grants, there was no relevant way to address them because I needed to focus on the cultural, political and economic results of the location of eastern terminus of the Pacific Railroad; it connected the West to the Midwest. as Lincoln desired, rather than to the South, as Jefferson Davis preferred in his term as U.S. Secretary of War. The land-grant financing mechanism was not espcially pertinent to the selection of a route.

The Gilded Age saga of immense grants of the public domain certainly deserves more attention. The railroads shaped the West in many ways, not least with their immense land grants, especially in the timber country.

Comment by George Draffan

March 27, 2008 @ 5:01 pm

There were dozens of railroad land grants in every area of the country, from Florida to Washington, from California to the Midwest. Ten percent of the lower 48 states were supposed to be sold in quarter-section parcels to settlers, but were instead sold to corporations. The result is not just clearcutting, but monopolies in transportation, mining, and real estate. The environmental, economic, and social problems set into motion by the railroad land grants continue today. Some of the history and consequences of the land grants can be seen at the website http://www.landgrant.org

Comment by kate grimes

March 28, 2008 @ 4:55 pm

Read Samuel Westerns “Pushed off the mountain sold down the river” for Western Myth debunking in Wyoming.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Comment spam protected by SpamBam