One solar power program mostly benefits wealthy people

Filed under: Class Warfare, Climate change, Energy — Ray Ring at 1:44 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Ray Ring

Ray Ring

Senior Editor

I suspect this kind of problem occurs pretty broadly, in many of the efforts to improve energy use in homes and businesses.

The problem: Mostly it’s wealthy people who conduct such efforts. They can afford to invest in expensive energy hardware like solar panels and better insulation and efficient appliances and windows.

It’s ironic too, because often as a result, their monthly electricity and gas bills are reduced.

Meanwhile, people who can’t afford to invest in solar panels and better appliances and windows pay higher monthly utility bills.

Here’s a story in the LA Daily News, about a local government program where three-fourths of the benefits go to wealthy residents. It indicates the pattern.

1 Comment »

Comment by Sol Shapiro

February 6, 2008 @ 10:05 am

You don’t have to go to California to find the “poor family in a 3 room apartment” subsidizing the rich. Amendment 37 in Colorado and its “son” HB 1281 are doing just this. Xcel Energy has provided me with input that the Renewable Eneergy charge on their ratepayers electric bill converts to a subsidy for photovoltaics on rich people’s roofs of about 31 cents per kilowatt hour.
This money, if spent for central station renewables such as solar thermal which have about 1/2 the capital cost of pv and can store energy for overnight use would benefit all ratepayers and would truly move us on a path toward a renewables future. The pv industry has done a great job of obfuscating the marginal benefit of their product as a distributed resource.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Comment spam protected by SpamBam