Jodi Peterson
Associate Editor
The country’s 540 wildlife refuges are in trouble. Understaffed and underfunded, some refuges have been closed to the public, while others limp along with demoralized workers and decayed buildings.
The sorry state of the refuge system is detailed in a new report, “Restoring America’s Wildlife Legacy 2007,” from a coalition of advocacy groups, the Cooperative Alliance for Refuge Enhancement (its 21 members include the NRA, Ducks Unlimited, and the Wilderness Society). According to the report, the refuge system received only $765 million last year — that’s half of the funding it needs to carry out its wildlife conservation mission:
The nearly 40 million annual visitors to America’s national wildlife refuges now confront with increasing frequency:
• Shortened or eliminated visitor center hours, and closed roads;
• Dilapidated viewing platforms and hiking trails;
• Eliminated biological and education programs;
• Reduced or cancelled hunting and fishing events;
• Outdated outreach materials, maps, brochures, and websites.
It’s all a matter of national priorities and where our government chooses to spend its money. As writer David Oates says in his essay “Imagine“:
One way to understand our Iraq war, with its terrible costs, is that it happened partly because war-making was the only compelling thing the governing party could imagine doing with the vast wealth and human resources of our nation. If not war, then … well, just send the money back. “The American people know best what to do with their own money.” Tax cuts. Cuts to health services, to environmental regulation and remediation, to student loans, the poor, even medical research. None of it apparently really worth doing.
The Iraq war costs $177 million per day. For the cost of 4.3 days of war, we could fund a year’s worth of staffing and maintenance on the nation’s 96 million acres of refuge lands.
Imagine.