‘Gun culture’ crushes an outdoors writer for being only 95% pro-guns

Filed under: Inside the Movement, Politics — Ray Ring at 1:06 pm on Monday, February 26, 2007
Ray Ring

Ray Ring

Senior Editor

This news needs no help from me. The Washington Post’s Blaine Harden has it nailed, reporting:

Modern hunters rarely become more famous than Jim Zumbo. A mustachioed, barrel-chested outdoors entrepreneur who lives in a log cabin near Yellowstone National Park, he has spent much of his life writing for prominent outdoors magazines, delivering lectures across the country and starring in cable TV shows about big-game hunting in the West.

Zumbo’s fame, however, has turned to black-bordered infamy within America’s gun culture — and his multimedia success has come undone. It all happened in the past week, after he publicly criticized the use of military-style assault rifles by hunters, especially those gunning for prairie dogs.

“Excuse me, maybe I’m a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity,” Zumbo wrote in his blog on the Outdoor Life Web site. … “As hunters, we don’t need to be lumped into the group of people who terrorize the world with them. . . . I’ll go so far as to call them ‘terrorist’ rifles.”

The reaction — from tens of thousands of owners of assault rifles across the country, from media and manufacturers rooted in the gun business, and from the National Rifle Association — has been swift, severe and unforgiving. Despite a profuse public apology and a vow to go hunting soon with an assault weapon, Zumbo’s career appears to be over.

His top-rated weekly TV program on the Outdoor Channel, his longtime career with Outdoor Life magazine and his corporate ties to the biggest names in gunmaking, including Remington Arms Co., have been terminated or are on the ropes.

… (Zumbo) is a 40-year NRA member and has appeared with NRA officials in 70 cities, according to his Web site.

In announcing that it was suspending its professional ties with Zumbo, the NRA … noted that the new Congress should pay careful attention to the outdoors writer’s fate.

“Our folks fully understand that their rights are at stake,” the NRA statement said. It warned that the “grassroots” passion that brought down Zumbo shows that millions of people would “resist with an immense singular political will any attempts to create a new ban on semi-automatic firearms.”

Some outdoors writers drew a different lesson from Zumbo’s horrible week.

“This shows the zealousness of gun owners to the point of actual foolishness,” said Pat Wray, a freelance outdoors writer in Corvallis, Ore., and author of “A Chukar Hunter’s Companion.”

Wray said that what happened to Zumbo is a case study in how the NRA has trained members to attack their perceived enemies without mercy.

Read the Post’s story to get the rest of the details. All I can add: Whatever you think about the right to have everyone armed with assault rifles, I hope this story triggers your dislike for bullying wherever it occurs. Hope some leading gun-toters step forward to say, what’s so terrifying about one of our own not being 100% politically correct?

4 Comments »

Comment by Kathy

March 1, 2008 @ 12:26 pm

Don’t think I’ve ever been 100% for or against anything. It’s good to see both sides, but the NRA can become so radical that they turn off many.

Comment by Mark Wright

March 3, 2008 @ 3:50 am

Some of the military version guns do make great coyote guns.

They are short, light and quick.

Hopefully America might wake up to the fact that if a few victims of the mass shootings ( about every week there’s an event it seems ) carried some weapons…well there would be less victims. That simple.

Another thing to think about: Sure airport security beefed up to stop the terrorists. Perhaps though, if passengers were allowed to carry guns on airplanes? Terror types would find those planes to be a very risky proposition.

Comment by Didi

March 3, 2008 @ 12:01 pm

It is always interesting to read both sides of the story since I have not made up my mind yet on what I believe.

Comment by Kate

March 4, 2008 @ 9:37 am

Jim Zumbo was just speaking the truth.
As a member of the NRA myself, I don’t see the reason to use assault rifles when hunting prairie dogs. It’s just not sporting - and isn’t that what hunting is all about? A sport?

Rhino, lions, bears, something of that nature, then yes, you have a case for using an assault rifle.

But prairie dogs? Take a .22 along with you and go have some fun.

Additionally, the general public has no reason for semi-automatic or automatic weapons.

Outlaw the weapons? No.
Use common sense? Yes.

Yes, a gun dealer should question a 18-year old senior coming in to purchase one.

A gun is a dangerous object that should be respected. Gun collection may be a hobby, but remember you are collecting weapons that should be appreciated, taken care of, and held with utmost respect. That means not leaving them loaded in your house. Not leaving them out where a child could find them. And if you have them in your house, take your child/teenager to a gun safety course before you even let them hold it.

COMMON SENSE, people.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Comment spam protected by SpamBam